Sigma SD9 Digital Camera
Out of stock |
Similar in Digital Cameras
- Camera Type: SLR/Professional
- Weight: 1.78 lb.
- LCD Screen Size: 1.8 in.
- Resolution: 3.5 Megapixel
- Overview
-
Reviews
-
Compare Prices
User ReviewRead All Reviews »
Will give any Nikon or Canon a run for their money
Pros
Image quality, resolution, sharpness, price of camera, lens selection, X3F technology, battery life
Cons
Lowlight noise, anything other than iso 100 isn't great, but that's it
Recommended it?
Yes
The Bottom Line:
If you're looking to get into the professional ranks but can't afford the top-of-the-line, go with Sigma
I've had the SD9 for almost 2 years now, and I am completely happy with my choice, considering the cameras this one compares with in terms of image quality are at least 3-4 times as expensive. Don't be fooled by those who think if you aren't using Canon or Nikon you aren't a pro. What the SD9 lacks in name recognition it more than makes up for in image resolution, detail, sharpness and much more.
The resolution and detail of this camera, coupled with great Sigma lenses like the 50mm EX macro, 24-70mm EX f2.8 and the 70-200mm f2.8 (all of which I own), is incredible. Think individual eyelashes separated in a full-body portrait, each strand of a spider web perfectly rendered with no stairstepping. It's incredible how big you can make these images, I'm getting a 24x36" print done as we speak.
So if you're looking to get into the DSLR market but dont have $3,000 or $5,000 or $8,000 to spend, go with the SD9 (now I'd recommend its successor, the SD10, and be sure to check if there's an SD11, which is rumored to be released Summer 2005). You can't really go wrong with the Sigma.
With the SD9, lowlight and nighttime shots are not the best, though with the SD10 improvements were made to noise reduction at higher ISOs. But for daytime shots, a portrait with the SD9 will match up with the Canon 1DS or Nikon D1 anyday of the week.
Use rechargeable CRV3's in this and you can go 1000 shots without having to recharge. Also get the battery grip, gives you double the battery power and the vertical shutter release.
The resolution and detail of this camera, coupled with great Sigma lenses like the 50mm EX macro, 24-70mm EX f2.8 and the 70-200mm f2.8 (all of which I own), is incredible. Think individual eyelashes separated in a full-body portrait, each strand of a spider web perfectly rendered with no stairstepping. It's incredible how big you can make these images, I'm getting a 24x36" print done as we speak.
So if you're looking to get into the DSLR market but dont have $3,000 or $5,000 or $8,000 to spend, go with the SD9 (now I'd recommend its successor, the SD10, and be sure to check if there's an SD11, which is rumored to be released Summer 2005). You can't really go wrong with the Sigma.
With the SD9, lowlight and nighttime shots are not the best, though with the SD10 improvements were made to noise reduction at higher ISOs. But for daytime shots, a portrait with the SD9 will match up with the Canon 1DS or Nikon D1 anyday of the week.
Use rechargeable CRV3's in this and you can go 1000 shots without having to recharge. Also get the battery grip, gives you double the battery power and the vertical shutter release.
